Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

LILLIE T. OETTINGER ET AL. v. CITY OF KINSTON.

Civil action tried upon the following issues:

"1. Was the injury and damage to plaintiffs' property caused by the unlawful acts or omissions of the defendant, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes.

2. What damage, if any, have the plaintiffs sustained by reason of such unlawful acts or omissions? Answer: $2,000."

From judgment on the verdict, the defendant appeals, assigning errors.

PER CURIAM.

A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the case has been tried in substantial conformity to the decisions apposite, and that no reversible error has been made to appear.

The law on the subject has been settled in a number of cases, notably Gore v. Wilmington, 194 N.C. 450, 140 S.E. 71, and Yowmans v. Hendersonville, 175 N.C. 574, 96 S.E. 45.

No error.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OETTINGER v. KINSTON
(Oct 1, 1932)