Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

HEIGEL v. HEIGEL.

Court of Appeals — Error proceedings — Seventy-day limitation runs from entry of judgment, not overruling new trial motion — Divorce and alimony.

It is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed upon the authority of Craig v. Welply, 104 Ohio St. 312, and Wells, Jr., v. Wells, 105 Ohio St. 471.

Judgment affirmed.

MARSHALL, C.J., JONES, MATTHIAS, DAY, ALLEN, KINKADE and STEPHENSON, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HEIGEL v. HEIGEL
(Jun 1, 1932)