Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ANNA SAKOS (SOCKOS), ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF STEPHEN SAKOS,DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HARRISON BYERS AND MABEL B. BYERS,DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The legislature vested the right of action for a wrongful death in an administrator ad prosequendum. A release given by the general administrator prior to the recovery of final judgment in no way affects the action vested in the administrator ad prosequendum.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BODINE, J.

The plaintiff brought this action as administrator ad prosequendum under the Death act. 2 Comp. Stat., p. 1904; 1 Cum. Supp. Comp. Stat., p. 926. The jury returned a verdict of no cause of action and the plaintiff appeals. It appears from the record that an attempt at settlement was made with the general administrator and money was paid thereunder. The learned trial judge directed the jury that in assessing damages credit should be given for the amount so paid. In this there was error.

The statute ( Pamph. L. 1917, p. 531; 1 Cum. Supp. Comp. Stat., p. 928) gives the right of action to the administrator ad prosequendum. That the moneys recovered are distributed by the general administrator, according to the law, can in no way affect the right of action. Stagg v. McCann, 95 N.J. Eq. 53; 96 Id. 327. Nor does the circumstance that the general administrator may recover for the loss to the estate between injury and death affect the present action. Soden v. Trenton and Mercer Traction Co., 101 N.J.L. 393 .

The 1917 amendment to the Death act changes the procedure to enforce the claim given by the Death act. It vests the right of action for a wrongful death in the administrator ad prosequendum. The legislature not only gave a cause of action but vested the right to enforce the same in a special administrator. The right to enforce the claim exists until the recovery of final judgment, and the acts of a stranger cannot disturb the proceeding.

Other matters suggested in the record need no discussion.

The judgment is reversed.

For affirmance — None.

For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, BROGAN, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 12.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SAKOS v. BYERS
(Oct 17, 1932)