Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • For the appellant, John W.
  • For the respondent, Saul
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • For the appellant, John W.
  • For the respondent, Saul
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

HYMAN HORDES, RESPONDENT, v. J.I. KISLAK, INCORPORATED, APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court, ubi supra. For affirmance — TRENCHARD, CASE, DONGES, BROGAN, KAYS, WELLS, JJ. 6.

For reversal — PARKER, VAN BUSKIRK, KERNEY, JJ. 3.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

HORDES v. J.I. KISLAK, INC
(Oct 17, 1932)