LYCZAK v. MARGULIES | N.J. | Judgment | Law | CaseMine

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem

AMICUS AI

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

For the appellant, Paul C.
For the respondents, John W.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

For the appellant, Paul C.
For the respondents, John W.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

ADAM B. LYCZAK, APPELLANT, v. BENJAMIN A. MARGULIES ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, BROGAN, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments