Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GURNEY, Respondent, v. GURNEY, et al, Appellants.

Appeal and Error.

Correct judgment should not be reversed on appeal, though based on erroneous conclusions or wrong reasons.

Polley, J., dissenting.

Note: On grounds for correct decision as not material, sec 2 R.C.L. 189; R.C.L. Perm. Supp. p. 366; R.C.L. Pocket Part, title "Appeal," § 163.

PER CURIAM.

Where it appears from the record that the judgment of the trial court was correct, it should not be reversed on appeal, even though based on erroneous conclusions or wrong reasons. Keith v. Schievelbein, 53 S.D. 421, 229 N.W. 858; Birken v. Hickey, 42 S.D. 472, 176 N.W. 137; Dwyer v. Chicago N.W.R. Co., 41 S.D. 535, 171 N.W. 760. Upon the entitre record in the instant case, a majority of the judges, while not in agreement with the reasoning or conclusions of the trial court, are nevertheless of the opinion that a substantially correct result was arrived at. The judgment and order appealed from are therefore affirmed.

CAMPBELL, P.J., and ROBERTS, WARREN, and RUDOLPH, JJ., concur.

POLLEY, J., dissents.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GURNEY v. GURNEY
(Nov 28, 1932)