Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MURRAY SIMONS and Others, Copartners Trading under the Firm Name and Style of SIMONS, BLAUNER CO., Plaintiffs, v. SAMUEL C. RUBIN, Defendant.

LA FETRA, Ch. J.

This is an action to recover the purchase price of certain stock. The evidence discloses that the plaintiffs on a certain day in September acted as brokers for the defendant, their customer, in the purchase of the stock in question. It was a transaction between agent and principal and not one between two principals as claimed by the defendant. The Statute of Frauds has no application. ( Friedman Co. v. Newman, 255 N.Y. 340.) Evidence bearing upon the agency subsequent to the order was admissible upon the question of fact involved. The stock was duly tendered to the defendant.

Judgment is directed in favor of the plaintiffs for the sum of $1,016.83, with interest thereon from the 10th day of September, 1929, together with costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SIMONS v. RUBIN
(Dec 7, 1932)