Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

REEDY, Respondent, v. EBSEN, Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

In the above-entitled actiton judgment below was for the plaintiff, and on appeal the case was affirmed. See same title, 60 S.D. 1, 242 N.W. 592. Thereafter, on request of defendant-appellant, a rehearing was granted and the case has been further argued.

After due consideration of all matters presented upon the rehearing, the former opinion is adhered to.

All the Judges concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

REEDY v. EBSEN
(Dec 30, 1932)