Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

LEACH v. CALIFORNIA.

Per Curiam

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co., 242 U.S. 539; Caldwell v. Sioux Falls Stock Yards Co., 242 U.S. 559; Merrick v. N.W. Halsey Co., 242 U.S. 568; Sloman v. Security Trust Co., 281 U.S. 704; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas (No. 1), 212 U.S. 86, 109; Bandini Co. v. Superior Court, 284 U.S. 8, 18; Sprales v. Binford, 288 U.S. 374, 393. Mr. Jesse I. Miller for appellant. Messrs. U.S. Webb and Tracy Chatfield Becker for appellee. Reported below: 215 Cal. 536; 12 P. (2d) 3.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LEACH v. CALIFORNIA
(Jan 9, 1933)