Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

FAITH G. SEVERANCE, Appellant, v. HAROLD C. SEVERANCE, Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The provision of the final judgment of divorce "directing payments of money for the support of the plaintiff" (Civ. Pr. Act, § 1159) should be stricken out, the plaintiff having remarried, but without prejudice to the right of the plaintiff to seek relief under the provisions of the contract of December 12, 1925. We express no opinion as to her right to support under such contract.

The order should be modified in accordance with this opinion and as so modified affirmed, without costs.

POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SEVERANCE v. SEVERANCE
(Jan 10, 1933)