Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MAX BERMAN, complainant, v. ONE-FORTY-FIVE BELMONT AVENUE CORPORATION etal., defendants.

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Bigelow, and reported in 109 N.J. Eq. 256. For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, BROGAN, HEHER, KAYS, HETFIELD, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BERMAN v. ONE-FORTY-FIVE BELMONT AVE. CORP
(Jan 23, 1933)