CAPRON v. LUCHARS, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Walter E. Cooper, for the complainant-
Mr. Philip Goodell
Riker Riker, for the defendants-

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Walter E. Cooper, for the complainant-
Mr. Philip Goodell
Riker Riker, for the defendants-

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

C. ALEXANDER CAPRON, executor, c., complainant-respondent, v. ROBERT B.LUCHARS, executor, defendant-respondent; ADELAIDE L. KETCHUM et al.,defendants-appellants.

PER CURIAM.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 110 N.J. Eq. 338. For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, DONGES, BROGAN, HEHER, KAYS, HETFIELD, WELLS, JJ. 10.

For reversal — CASE, BODINE, KERNEY, JJ. 3.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

CAPRON v. LUCHARS

C. ALEXANDER CAPRON, executor, c., complainant-respondent, v. ROBERT B.LUCHARS, executor, defendant-respondent; ADELAIDE L. KETCHUM et al.,defendants-appellants.

Comments