Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MASSACHUSETTS BONDING AND INSURANCE COMPANY vs. H. J. PETTAPIECE.

EXCEPTIONS. RULES OF COURT.

Exceptions to the acceptance of a report of referees, when permitted by the rule of reference must be in conformity to Rule XXI of the Rules of the Supreme and Superior Courts, which requires that the objection to the report of the referees must be filed in writing. Non-compliance with this rule renders exceptions invalid.

BARNES, J.

On exceptions. An action on instruments declared to be promissory notes was referred, with right to except as to questions of law.

Report was filed in due course. No objection, in writing, to the report of referee was filed or presented. Report was accepted at the term next after filing, and exceptions allowed.

Rules of Court are binding on Justices of the Superior Court. Camp Maqua Y. W. C. A. v. Poland, 130 Me. 485, 157 A. 859; Lincoln v. Hall, 131 Me. 310, 162 A. 267.

Because of non-compliance with No. XXI, Rules of Supreme and Superior Courts, requiring objection to report of a referee to be filed in writing, nothing is gained from the exceptions. It may be added that probably the application of the rule entails no hardship on the excepting party.

Exceptions overruled.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BONDING AND INSURANCE CO. v. PETTAPIECE
(Mar 28, 1933)