Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Taylor, Bues Grabiel, for plaintiff in
  • Mr. John W. Bricker, attorney general, Mr. L.F. Laylin, Mr. William J. Ford, Mr. Donald Hoskins, prosecuting attorney,
  • Mr. Eugene Carlin, for defendants in
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Taylor, Bues Grabiel, for plaintiff in
  • Mr. John W. Bricker, attorney general, Mr. L.F. Laylin, Mr. William J. Ford, Mr. Donald Hoskins, prosecuting attorney,
  • Mr. Eugene Carlin, for defendants in
See more information ...
Smart Summary

FRANKLIN-AMERICAN LAUNDRY DRY CLEANING CO. v. TAX COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL.

Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved.

It is ordered and adjudged that said petition in error be, and the same is hereby, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional question is involved in said cause.

Petition in error dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., DAY, ALLEN, STEPHENSON, JONES and MATTHIAS, JJ., concur.

KINKADE, J., not participating.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

FRANKLIN-AM. LAUNDRY DRY CLEANING v. TAX
(Apr 26, 1933)