Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ELMER E. TARBURTON, complainant-appellant, v. EDNA JOHNSON, executrix, c., et al., defendants-respondents.

Where a signed copy of a business agreement was delivered to complainant and he subsequently executed three supplemental agreements and worked for ten years under the original agreement, he cannot maintain now that he is not bound by its terms.

PER CURIAM.

The decree under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Davis as above.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TARBURTON v. JOHNSON
(Apr 28, 1933)