DINGER v. ROTHERY, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

For the appellants, Patrick H.
For the respondent, Albert S.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

For the appellants, Patrick H.
For the respondent, Albert S.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

JEAN T. DINGER, RECEIVER OF THE WESTMONT NATIONAL BANK, AN INSOLVENTINSTITUTION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JULIA M. ROTHERY AND GEORGE A.ROTHERY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Commisioner Eldredge.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

DINGER v. ROTHERY

JEAN T. DINGER, RECEIVER OF THE WESTMONT NATIONAL BANK, AN INSOLVENTINSTITUTION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JULIA M. ROTHERY AND GEORGE A.ROTHERY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Comments