Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

DAVID KAUFMAN, Plaintiff, v. INVESTORS SYNDICATE, a Minnesota Corporation, Defendant. See, also, 148 Misc. 624.

WASSERVOGEL, J.

The allegation in the first defense that the agreement here involved "is and always has been in all respects legal, valid and enforceable; that under the laws of the State of Minnesota which govern, plaintiff has no cause of action," is but a legal conclusion. No facts from which such conclusion can be drawn are pleaded. The second defense is insufficient as a matter of law inasmuch as advice claimed to have been given to defendant by the Superintendent of Banks with respect to the legality of defendant's transactions is not a defense to this action.

Motion to strike out both defenses granted, with leave to defendant to plead anew with respect to the first defense within ten days upon payment of ten dollars costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KAUFMAN v. INVESTORS SYNDICATE
(Jun 12, 1933)