AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JULES-WALLACE CO., INC., Appellant, v. R.A. MANAGEMENT, INC., Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Under the authorities it would seem that the validity of the assignment herein is to be tested as of the date when the power of attorney was executed. ( Thompson v. Erie R.R. Co., 207 N.Y. 171; Thompson v. Gimbel Bros., 71 Misc. 126; affd., 145 A.D. 436; affd., 207 N.Y. 659.) So tested the assignment is void as against public policy or at least not enforcible in an action at law against the employer, for the reason that it is an assignment of wages under a contract for employment not then existing. ( Cooper v. Douglass, 44 Barb. 409; Williston Cont. § 414; Restatement, Contracts, § 154, subd. 2.)

Judgment affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs.

All concur; present, LYDON, CALLAHAN and FRANKENTHALER, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JULES-WALLACE CO., INC., v. R.A. MANAGEMENT
(Jun 15, 1933)