AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

RICHARD J. PEARL, Appellant, v. SEVENTH AVENUE FILM CO., LTD., et al., Respondents.

The complaint states a good cause of action for an accounting against the defendant corporation, and not against the defendant Reubenson, and the first question certified is so answered, and the order of the Appellate Division in that regard is so modified, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division in favor of appellant and against the corporation respondent. The order of arrest against the defendant Reubenson was not properly granted and the second question is so answered, and the order of the Appellate Division in that regard is affirmed, with costs in this court in favor of respondent Reubenson and against appellant. No opinion. (See 262 N.Y. 513, 639.)

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN and CROUCH, JJ. Not sitting: HUBBS, J.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEARL v. SEVENTH AVENUE FILM CO., LTD
(Jul 11, 1933)