Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DAVIDTER v. ASH.

CLARK, J.

Plaintiff has appealed from judgment on verdict directed in an action for damages for fraud in the sale of securities.

The measure of damages in such case is the difference at time of sale in value of the securities as they were represented and as they were. On this matter plaintiff was put to proof and failed, the only evidence worthy of note being that some months later a receiver was appointed for the corporation issuing the securities. This was insufficient to support an assessment of damages, as the trial court correctly held.

Affirmed.

McDONALD, C.J., and POTTER, SHARPE, NORTH, FEAD, WIEST, and BUTZEL, JJ., concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DAVIDTER v. ASH
(Aug 29, 1933)