Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

H. D. GOODE v. THOMAS A. JOHNSON et al.

PER CURIAM. —

Since the judgment herein was rendered on the pleadings in the cause, the Federal Supreme Court in Nixon v. Condon, 286 U.S. 73, 52 Sup. Ct. Rep. 484, 76 L.Ed. 629 (See also White v. County Democratic Executive Committee, 60 Fed. [2nd] 973; West v. Bliley, 33 Fed. Rep. [2nd] 177; Bliley v. West, 42 Fed. Rep. [2nd] 101), has announced pertinent principles which had not theretofore been adjudicated by the controlling authority and which could not have been considered in rendering the judgment in this cause; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that the judgment be reversed and the cause remanded for appropriate proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GOODE v. JOHNSON, ET AL
(Sep 5, 1933)