AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

In the Matter of the Claim of HAROLD EISENBERG, Respondent, against ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant. STATE INDUSTRIAL BOARD, Respondent.

Award affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Hill, P.J., Crapser Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Rhodes, J., dissents, with a memorandum.

RHODES, J. (dissenting).

I dissent. The claimant worked substantially the whole of the year preceding his injury, but was a five-day worker. The wage rate should, therefore, be computed in accordance with subdivision 3 of section 14 Work. Comp. of the Workmen's Compensation Law. (See Matter of Remmert v. Weidenmeyer, 237 App. Div. 147; affd., 262 N.Y. ___.)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF EISENBERG v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY
(Sep 1, 1933)