AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

INTRASTATE OIL COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, RELATOR-APPELLANT, v. THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF ORANGE, BUILDING AND PLUMBINGINSPECTOR, THOMAS DOWLING, AND CITY CLERK WILLIAM F. CHRISTIANSEN,RESPONDENTS.

The refusal by the Supreme Court of a writ of mandamus is not reviewable unless the constitutionality of a statute is involved.

The opinion of the court was delivered by BODINE, J.

The relator attempts to have us review an order of the Supreme Court discharging a rule to show cause why mandamus should not issue to compel the issuance of a building permit and a license for the erection of a gasoline service station.

Since the constitutionality of a statute is not involved, the Supreme Court's refusal of mandamus is not reviewable in this court. Matlack v. Lloyd, 82 N.J.L. 739 ; Camden v. Public Service Railway Co., 84 Id. 309.

The appeal must be dismissed.

For dismissal — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 13.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

INTRASTATE OIL CO. v. BOARD OF COMMRS., ORANGE
(Sep 27, 1933)