AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE EATON AXLE AND SPRING COMPANY, RESPONDENT, v. BREEZE CORPORATIONS,INCORPORATED, APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court, and printed in 10 N.J. Mis. R. 1100.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, CASE, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 8.

For dismissal — PARKER, KAYS, JJ. 2.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EATON AXLE, c., CO. v. BREEZE CORPORATIONS, INC
(Sep 27, 1933)