Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

CHESTER LAWRENCE v. B. BELZER FRUIT COMPANY AND ANOTHER. Reported in 250 N.W. 75.

Workmen's compensation act — award of compensation sustained.

Evidence examined and found to support the award of the industrial commission.

Certiorari upon the relation of B. Belzer Fruit Company, employer, and Western Casualty Insurance Company, its insurer, to review an order of the industrial commission awarding compensation to Chester Lawrence, employe, for an accidental injury to his eye. Affirmed.

LORING, Justice.

This case comes here upon a writ of certiorari from the industrial commission. Respondent was awarded compensation, before a referee of the industrial commission, for an injury to his eye, and the employer and its insurer appealed to the industrial commission, which affirmed the award.

Respondent was a truck driver in the employ of the B. Belzer Fruit Company. March 4, 1932, he had trouble with one of his eyes and consulted a doctor. The doctor testified that he removed a foreign substance from the eye. The doctor treated the eye later and reported it to be doing well. Respondent went back to work, and May 17, 1932, he was obliged to discontinue working because of the pain in the eye. He was sent to several physicians by the insured or its representative. The evidence is somewhat conflicting; but the respondent himself, upon cross-examination, and his wife upon direct examination, testified that the eye never completely recovered from the original injury, which the evidence shows was inflicted by a particle of wood from the boxes which the employe was handling in the course of his employment.

The industrial commission has found for the employe. We think the evidence justifies its finding. Respondent is allowed $50 attorney's fees over and above his taxable costs and disbursements.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LAWRENCE v. B. BELZER FRUIT CO
(Sep 29, 1933)