Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

EDWARD H. BARNETT, complainant, v. SCHICKERLING PRODUCTS CORPORATION,defendant.

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 112 N.J. Eq. 1. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BARNETT v. SCHICKERLING PRODUCTS CORP
(Sep 27, 1933)