1. By resuming their relations as man and wife, complainant condoned any act of cruelty on the part of the husband which had preceded that date.
2. Held, that there was nothing that defendant husband did thereafter of which she could properly complain. His subsequent actions were not such as to destroy the effect of the condonation.
PER CURIAM.
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Advisory Master Reed in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.