AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

EUGENIE LOEB and EDMUND LOEB, Appellants, v. NASSAU ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY and WILLIAM BRENNAN, Respondents, Impleaded with WILLIAM EGAN, Defendant.

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion, there was sufficient proof of the retainer and acceptance thereof by the trial justice as counsel for plaintiff, and all proceedings before him, therefore, were without jurisdiction and void. ( People v. Haas, 105 App. Div. 119; People v. Conner, 142 N.Y. 130; People v. Whitridge, No. 2, 144 App. Div. 493; Seaward v. Tasker, 143 N.Y. Supp. 257 [not officially published]; Oakley v. Aspinwall, 3 N.Y. 547; Elmira Realty Co. v. Gibson, 103 App. Div. 140.) Lazansky, P.J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LOEB v. NASSAU ELECTRIC RAILROAD COMPANY
(Nov 1, 1933)