CENTRAL ICE CREAM CANDY CO. v. HOME INS. CO

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

13725

Attorney(S)

Messrs. Benet, Shand McGowan and W.C. Boyd, Jr., for appellant, cite: As to reformation of contract: 115 S.C. 452; 161 S.C. 249; 168 S.C. 150; 35 F.2d 571; 71 A.L.R., 128; 76 A.L.R., 1209; 6 A.L.R., 367; 35 F.2d 675; 32 C.J., 1142; 154 S.W. 32. Messrs. J.A. Hutto and J. Hughes Cooper, for respondent, cite: As to mutual mistake in contract: 115 S.C. 452; 161 S.C. 249; 168 S.C. 150; 86 S.C. 691; 67 S.C. 400; 74 S.C. 246; 166 S.E., 887; 98 U.S. 79. Fire insurance contracts: 23 R.C.L., 351; 32 C.J., 1142.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

13725

Attorney(S)

Messrs. Benet, Shand McGowan and W.C. Boyd, Jr., for appellant, cite: As to reformation of contract: 115 S.C. 452; 161 S.C. 249; 168 S.C. 150; 35 F.2d 571; 71 A.L.R., 128; 76 A.L.R., 1209; 6 A.L.R., 367; 35 F.2d 675; 32 C.J., 1142; 154 S.W. 32. Messrs. J.A. Hutto and J. Hughes Cooper, for respondent, cite: As to mutual mistake in contract: 115 S.C. 452; 161 S.C. 249; 168 S.C. 150; 86 S.C. 691; 67 S.C. 400; 74 S.C. 246; 166 S.E., 887; 98 U.S. 79. Fire insurance contracts: 23 R.C.L., 351; 32 C.J., 1142.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

CENTRAL ICE CREAM CANDY CO. v. HOME INS. CO.

November 27, 1933. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BLEASE.

This is a cause in equity. The appellant raises no question as to any legal proposition depended upon by the trial Judge in his decree. The only question raised is that the evidence did not support the conclusion reached.

The burden is on the appellant to show that there was an error below in the findings of fact. Our examination of the record does not convince us that there was such error.

The decree of the county Judge, which will be reported, is affirmed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES STABLER, CARTER and BONHAM and MR. ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE W.C. COTHRAN concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

CENTRAL ICE CREAM CANDY CO. v. HOME INS. CO.

Comments