Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

IN RE DISBARMENT OF ANDREAS K. STAUNING. Reported in 252 N.W. 84.

Attorney and client — disbarment — proceedings — default of accused.

1. When the accused in a disbarment proceeding is in default for want of an answer, an order for discipline will be entered upon the assumption that he is guilty as charged in the accusation if the accusation states facts constituting misconduct.
Same — misconduct warranting disbarment.

2. The misconduct charged in the accusation here presented is such as to require disbarment.

Proceeding by the state board of law examiners for the disbarment of Andreas K. Stauning. After respondent had appeared and filed an unverified answer, he withdrew his answer and stipulated that the matter be submitted to this court as upon default. Judgment of disbarment ordered.

PER CURIAM.

This is an accusation in this court by the board of law examiners for the discipline of Andreas K. Stauning, an attorney of this state, defendant. The accusation and order to appear and answer were duly served. Defendant appeared and filed an unverified answer. Thereafter, by stipulation made and filed, defendant withdrew the answer and stipulated by his attorney that the matter be submitted to this court as if no answer had been interposed and as upon default. Under the rule adopted by this court, we proceed to determine the accusation on the assumption that defendant is guilty as charged in the accusation. In re Disbarment of Bodin, 189 Minn. 396, 249 N.W. 569.

The accusation, briefly stated, is that in two guardianship matters, in one of which defendant was the guardian and in the other the attorney for the guardian, he misappropriated and failed to account for or repay to the guardian, ward, or estate substantial sums of money, the property of the ward in each case. Some of the acts charged occurred more than two years before the commencement of this proceeding, but other acts of misconduct were within the two years, and the defaults in each case continued and do now continue.

The misconduct charged is such as to require disbarment, and it is ordered that judgment be entered disbarring Andreas K. Stauning from practicing law in the state of Minnesota.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE DISBARMENT OF ANDREAS K. STAUNING
(Dec 29, 1933)