JEWEL TEA CO., INC., v. CITY OF CAMDEN

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

13748

Attorney(S)

Mr. L.A. Wittkowsky, for appellant, cites: As to intrastate shipment: 55 F.2d 347; 187 U.S. 622; 233 U.S. 334; 5 R.C.L., 713; 204 U.S. 403; 51 L.Ed., 540; 244 U.S. 346; 61 L.Ed., 1181; 260 U.S. 166; 12 F.2d 541; 29 L.R.A. (N.S.), 745; 38 S.C. 365; 37 A.S.R., 767; 17 S.E., 147; 122 Ga. 365; 50 S.E., 132; 61 A., 695. Reasonable ordinance: 48 S.C. 570; 125 S.C. 530. Mr. Murdoch M. Johnson, for respondent, cites: Interstate shipment: 12 C.J., 38; 12 C.J., 107; 120 U.S. 489; 187 U.S. 622; 227 U.S. 389; 227 U.S. 401. Interstate commerce cannot be taxed by state: 236 U.S. 568; 227 U.S. 401; 91 U.S. 275; 55 S.C. 477; 33 S.E., 560; 52 S.C. 508; 30 S.E., 609; 42 S.C. 211; 20 S.E., 544; 49 S.C. 527; 27 S.E., 469; 153 U.S. 289; 14 S.Ct., 829; 236 U.S. 157; 59 L.Ed., 517; 247 U.S. 105; 62 L.Ed., 1006; 1 A.L.R., 1278; 263 U.S. 291; 44 S.Ct., 96; 68 L.Ed., 308.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

13748

Attorney(S)

Mr. L.A. Wittkowsky, for appellant, cites: As to intrastate shipment: 55 F.2d 347; 187 U.S. 622; 233 U.S. 334; 5 R.C.L., 713; 204 U.S. 403; 51 L.Ed., 540; 244 U.S. 346; 61 L.Ed., 1181; 260 U.S. 166; 12 F.2d 541; 29 L.R.A. (N.S.), 745; 38 S.C. 365; 37 A.S.R., 767; 17 S.E., 147; 122 Ga. 365; 50 S.E., 132; 61 A., 695. Reasonable ordinance: 48 S.C. 570; 125 S.C. 530. Mr. Murdoch M. Johnson, for respondent, cites: Interstate shipment: 12 C.J., 38; 12 C.J., 107; 120 U.S. 489; 187 U.S. 622; 227 U.S. 389; 227 U.S. 401. Interstate commerce cannot be taxed by state: 236 U.S. 568; 227 U.S. 401; 91 U.S. 275; 55 S.C. 477; 33 S.E., 560; 52 S.C. 508; 30 S.E., 609; 42 S.C. 211; 20 S.E., 544; 49 S.C. 527; 27 S.E., 469; 153 U.S. 289; 14 S.Ct., 829; 236 U.S. 157; 59 L.Ed., 517; 247 U.S. 105; 62 L.Ed., 1006; 1 A.L.R., 1278; 263 U.S. 291; 44 S.Ct., 96; 68 L.Ed., 308.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

JEWEL TEA CO., INC., v. CITY OF CAMDEN.

January 9, 1934. The opinion of the Court was delivered by

MR. JUSTICE STABLER.

For the reasons stated by his Honor, Judge Dennis, in his decree, which will be reported, the judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BLEASE and MESSRS. JUSTICES CARTER and BONHAM concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.