Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE v. JAMES DALLAS HAMLET, ALIAS JAMES DALLAS TEACHEY.

Criminal Law L a —

Where defendant, convicted of a capital felony, fails to prosecute his appeal, a motion by the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss will be allowed where no error appears on the face of the record.

STACY, C.J.

At the January Term, 1934, Duplin Superior Court, the defendant herein, James Dallas Hamlet, alias James Dallas Teachey, was tried upon an indictment charging him with burglary in the first degree, C.S., 4232, which resulted in a conviction and sentence of death. From the judgment thus entered, the prisoner gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court, and was allowed thirty days within which to make out and serve statement of case on appeal, and the solicitor was given thirty days thereafter to prepare and file exceptions or countercase, but nothing has been done towards perfecting the appeal. No bond was required. S. v. Stafford, 203 N.C. 601, 166 S.E. 734.

The prisoner having failed to prosecute his appeal, or to comply with the rules governing such procedure, the motion of the Attorney-General to docket and dismiss must be allowed ( S. v. Johnson, 205 N.C. 610; S. v. Rector, 203 N.C. 9, 164 S.E. 339), but this we do only after an examination of the record to see that no error appears on the face thereof, as the life of the prisoner is involved. S. v. Goldston, 201 N.C. 89, 158 S.E. 926; S. v. Ward, 180 N.C. 693, 104 S.E. 531.

No error appears on the face of the record. S. v. Edney, 202 N.C. 706, 164 S.E. 23.

Appeal dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. HAMLET
(May 1, 1934)