AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

GIANT TIGER CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THECITY OF TRENTON, RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, HEHER, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 10.

For reversal — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, PERSKIE, DEAR, JJ. 3.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GIANT TIGER CORP. v. BD. OF COMMRS. OF CITY OF TRENTON
(May 4, 1934)