Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PROTEST OF OKLAHOMA PIPE LINE CO.

(Syllabus.)

Hospitals — Care of Tubercular Patients as State Charge — Statute Placing Tax Burden on Counties Unconstitutional in Part.

Under article 21 of the Constitution of Oklahoma, an institution for the care of tubercular patients which is maintained by the state shall be at the expense of the state. That portion of section 5281, O. S. 1931, which attempts to place a portion of that tax burden upon the counties is in violation of the Constitution and inoperative.

ANDREWS, J.

This is an appeal by the protestee from a judgment of the Court of Tax Review sustaining the protest of the Oklahoma Pipe Line Company to a certain tax levy for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1931, made by the excise board of Carter county.

The protest involves only the item of 109 mill levied for the tubercular and public health fund of the county.

It was stipulated and agreed between the parties hereto that the question involved is involved in cause numbered 23526, and that the judgment rendered in that action on the issue here presented shall be the judgment in this case. Under that stipulation the judgment of the Court of Tax Review is affirmed, under the rule stated in Protest of Chicago, R.I. P. Ry. Co., 164 Okla. 114, 23 P.2d 158.

CULLISON, V. C. J., and SWINDALL, McNEILL, and BAYLESS, JJ., concur. RILEY, C. J., and OSBORN, BUSBY, and WELCH, JJ., absent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PROTEST OF OKLAHOMA PIPE LINE CO
(May 8, 1934)