Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

AMERICAN HARDWARE AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY, IN BEHALF OF SELF AND OTHER CREDITORS, v. MOUNT AIRY HARDWARE COMPANY.

Fraudulent Conveyances A c —

An assignment, valid in form, executed for a valid consideration without evidence that the assignee had knowledge of assignor's insolvency at the time of the assignment is held valid and binding on other creditors of the assignor.

PER CURIAM.

The sole question presented in the case is whether the assignment of a part of funds, derived from certain fire insurance policies made to the intervenor by the defendant company through its president and general manager prior to the receivership, is valid and binding upon the receiver. The assignment was reduced to writing and appears in the record. It is valid in form. It was given for valid considerations. There is nothing to indicate that the intervenor had any knowledge of the insolvency of the defendant at the time of the assignment. We conclude that the assignment is valid and find in the trial below.

No error.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EQUIPMENT CO. v. HARDWARE CO
(Jul 1, 1934)