Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

RALPH J. VOORHIES, et ux. v. MABEL ELDRIDGE BARNSLEY, Executrix.

DAVIS, C. J. —

Mabel Eldredge Barnsley, as executrix of the estate of May Eldredge, deceased, obtained a final decree of foreclosure of a mortgage against Ralph J. Voorhies, Adele Voorhies, his wife, Roy Hough and Yowell-Drew Lumber Company, a corporation. Ralph J. Voorhies and his wife have appealed from the final decree and a supplementary order overruling their objections to confirmation of the master's sale of the mortgaged property.

Appellants' objection that plaintiff below in the foreclosure suit was a married woman suing as executrix without joinder of her husband or next friend, and that the husband of said plaintiff executrix had not consented to her appointment as such, came too late when it was interposed for the first time after final decree and only in the form of an objection to confirmation of the foreclosure sale.

There was a sufficient return of service of process on the defendant, Roy Hough, to bring that defendant before the Court and give the Court jurisdiction over his person, so that if for any reason said defendant deemed the return of service to be irregular, the burden was placed on him to raise such objection affirmatively. This such defendant did not do.

Where service of process is irregular or voidable, but constitutes such notice of the pending proceedings as to require a served defendant to respond to the court, either waiving the alleged defects or contesting the service or return by special objection thereto, the defect does not render the judgment void and may be waived by a joint defendant's failure to object thereto. See Walker v. Carver, 93 Fla. 337, 112 Sou. Rep. 45.

The decrees appealed from are affirmed.

WHITFIELD, BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VOORHIES ET UX. v. BARNSLEY
(Aug 10, 1934)