Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

VICTOR TALKING MACHINE COMPANY, complainant-appellant, v. WILLIAM CAUBRE,defendant-respondent.

1. Where a release is pleaded in an action at law which is claimed to have been obtained by fraud, the issue of fraud can be determined in that action, and injunctive relief in this court is improper.

2. A motion to strike out a bill seeking such injunctive relief will be sustained.

PER CURIAM.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Davis in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

VICTOR TALKING MACHINE CO. v. CAUBRE
(Sep 27, 1934)