IN RE PEAKE, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. J. Raymond Tiffany, for the appellant William P.
Mr. William B. Stites, for the respondents Emma Reilly et al.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. J. Raymond Tiffany, for the appellant William P.
Mr. William B. Stites, for the respondents Emma Reilly et al.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

In the matter of the appeal from the decree or order of the prerogativecourt, affirming the order or decree of the Hudson county orphans court,declaring HENRY GRATER et al., entitled to share equally as nephews andnieces in a one-half interest in the personal estate of ELIZABETH PEAKE,deceased.

PER CURIAM.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder, and reported in 115 N.J. Eq. 233. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

IN RE PEAKE

In the matter of the appeal from the decree or order of the prerogativecourt, affirming the order or decree of the Hudson county orphans court,declaring HENRY GRATER et al., entitled to share equally as nephews andnieces in a one-half interest in the personal estate of ELIZABETH PEAKE,deceased.

Comments