PER CURIAM.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Heher, in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, DONGES, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.