Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

SARAH H. ZWEIG, petitioner-appellant, v. BENJAMIN ZWEIG,defendant-respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This is the wife's appeal from an order of the court of chancery dated February 28th, 1934, denying her motion to strike out the husband's answer in a divorce case.

A careful examination of the record satisfies us that the motion was properly denied, and the order under review is affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ZWEIG v. ZWEIG
(Sep 27, 1934)