Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GREAT ATLANTIC PACIFIC TEA CO. v. DONALDSON.

BROWN, Justice.

The statement of the evidence adduced on the trial touching the relation between the defendant and Hays, the truck driver, embodied in brief filed in support of the petition for review, when compared with the statement and conclusion in the opinion of the Court of Appeals touching such relation, clearly shows that this feature of the controversy depends upon a disputed interpretation of the evidence in the case. There is nothing in the statement of the opinion to indicate the duration of the contract or the right of the defendant to terminate it at pleasure, or for cause; therefore, this question, under the established rules of review, is not before us. Ex parte Harris Transfer Warehouse Co., 214 Ala. 6, 106 So. 223; Waldrop v. State, 223 Ala. 413, 136 So. 736; Postal Tel.-Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals, as amplified, rests the reversal on a finding of fact that the verdict is contrary to the great weight of the evidence, and necessitates a denial of the writ. Authorities supra.

Writ denied; petition dismissed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GREAT ATLANTIC PACIFIC TEA CO. v. DONALDSON
(Oct 4, 1934)