Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOHNSON v. ADERHOLD, Warden.

PER CURIAM.

In June, 1928, Matthew Johnson was sentenced on his pleas of guilty to indictments charging robbery under the Code of the District of Columbia 1929, title 6, § 34, and to a third indictment charging assault with intent to commit robbery in violation of section 28 of the same title. The sentences imposed were ten years and eight years, respectively, on the first two indictments, and five years on the assault charge; the sentences to run consecutively in the order named. He appeals from an order denying his petition for the writ of habeas corpus.

It is enough to say, since the first sentence of ten years imposed has not expired, that the application for habeas corpus was premature. The question of the validity of the other two sentences is not properly before us for consideration.

The judgment is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JOHNSON v. ADERHOLD
(Oct 24, 1934)