Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PHILO HOOPER ET AL v. THE STATE.

Bail Bond — Appeal Dismissed.

On appeal from final judgment forfeiting bail bond, briefs must be filed in trial court and in Court of Criminal Appeals, and where same is not done and no waiver of the filing appears from the record, appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

KRUEGER, JUDGE. —

This is an appeal from a final judgment upon the forfeiture of a bail bond.

There are no briefs filed in this court and it is not made to appear from the record that any were filed by the appellants in the trial court, and no waiver of the filing of such briefs appears from the record. Under such conditions this court is required to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. It is the uniform holding of this court that in cases such as this briefs must be filed in the trial court and in this court in compliance with law and the rules governing civil cases, or a waiver of such filing must appear of record. Article 2283, R. C. S., 1925; article 866, C. C. P. Lewis et al v. State, 109 Tex. Crim. 661, 7 S.W.2d 74.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal in this case be and the same is dismissed.

Appeal Dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOOPER v. STATE
(Oct 17, 1934)