AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

JAMES A. CARDINAL, Respondent, v. MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, and JOHN ROSHIRT, INC., et al., Respondents.

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division. Held, that there was, on the findings, no disclosure of the true interest of the assured and the policy was void and not subject to reformation. ( Lasher v. St. Joseph Fire Mar. Ins. Co., 86 N.Y. 423; Skinner v. Norman, 165 N.Y. 565, 571. See, also, Commercial Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Crawford, 219 App. Div. 110.) No opinion. (See 266 N.Y. 542.)

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ. Dissenting: CRANE, J. Not sitting: LOUGHRAN, J.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CARDINAL v. MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY, JOHN ROSHIRT
(Dec 7, 1934)