Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DAVIS v. STATE.

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of felony as charged in the second count of the indictment. Said count of the indictment charged him with the offense of unlawfully having in his possession a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors or beverages. The court, as the law requires, sentenced him to serve an indeterminate term of imprisonment in the penitentiary. From the judgment of conviction this appeal was taken.

The action of the trial court in denying defendant's motion for a new trial is not presented for consideration. There is no bill of exceptions, the appeal is rested solely upon the record proper, and, where this is true, no question other than the regularity of the proceedings in the court below as shown by the record can be considered. We ascertain from a consideration of this record that the proceedings were regular in all respects, and, as no error is apparent, the judgment of conviction appealed from will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DAVIS v. STATE
(Jan 22, 1935)