Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of BERRY WOLF, Appellant, against JOHN H. DELANEY et al., Constituting the BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Respondents.

Per Curiam.

Section 31 of the Civil Service Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 7) is not violative of the preferences allowed by section 6 of article V of the Constitution and section 21 of the Civil Service Law. While the point was not directly presented in Matter of Clancy v. Halleran ( 263 N.Y. 258), we agree with the courts below that the reasoning of the opinion in that case leads to the conclusion that section 31 of the Civil Service Law does not defeat any preference granted by section 21 in accordance with section 6 of article V of the Constitution.

The order should be affirmed, without costs.

CRANE, Ch. J., LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, CROUCH and LOUGHRAN, JJ., concur; FINCH, J., not sitting.

Order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF WOLF v. DELANEY
(Feb 26, 1935)