Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STONE et al. v. BOND et al.

(Syllabus.)

Appeal and Error — Dismissal — Moot Questions.

The Supreme Court will not attempt to determine abstract, hypothetical, or moot questions, and where it is made to appear that the questions brought up for review have become moot, the proceedings will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

This case involved the application of U.S. Stone, a candidate on the Republican ticket for nominee as United States Senator, to enjoin the placing on the ballot the name of Wirt Franklin. The question involved has become moot, and under the opinions of this court decided and announced in the following cases, the appeal is dismissed: Revard v. Givens, 139 Okla. 60, 281 P. 233; Watters v. District Court, 162 Okla. 251, 19 P.2d 1075; Glass v. Banfield Bros. Packing Co., 168 Okla. 217, 32 P.2d 713; Campbell v. Reynolds, 167 Okla. 365, 29 P.2d 941; Douglas v. Baker, 167 Okla. 348, 29 P.2d 619.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STONE v. BOND
(Apr 16, 1935)