Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

SOL DOUGLAS, Respondent, v. CORNELIUS F. COLLINS, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative. No opinion.

Concur: LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ. CRANE, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN and FINCH, JJ., concur on the ground that the motion should not have been entertained under rule 107, subdivision 9.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DOUGLAS v. COLLINS
(Apr 30, 1935)