Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HAROLD R. BOWMAN vs. PARKER BOWMAN BAKING COMPANY, INC.

Receiver held not liable for claims of employees for over-time wages under N.R.A. Codes.

McEVOY, J.

This motion is in connection with a letter dated March 22, 1935, written by Morgan R. Mooney, Esq., Labor Compliance Officer, which is marked Exhibit A in Receiver's motion as to alleged wage claims.

Exhibit A, pointed out that forty hours a week is the maximum as set by the baking industry code and that an investigation had indicated this had been violated. In advising them to file a claim for time and one-half, as provided by the code for overtime, he stated, "it is customary for the N.R.A. to adjust such violations, and it is the opinion of this office that you have a legal and enforceable claim for that amount. For this reason, I am advising that you file claim with the Superior Court."

The basis of these claims seems to be that it is alleged that these various employees were employed by Parker Bowman Baking Company.

The alleged claims for wages do not grow out of an employment by Parker Bowman Baking Company but they arise out of the conduct of the business of that concern by the Receiver.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BOWMAN v. PARKER BOWMAN BAKING CO
(Apr 30, 1935)