Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

R. FRANK SEAY v. SENTINEL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

Appeal and Error J d —

Where the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not sitting, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.

Civil action to recover agent's commissions on insurance premium renewals, "paid to and accepted by the (defendant) company, while this (agency) contract is in force . . . limit 9 years."

The defendant sought to terminate its agency contract with the plaintiff, prior to the expiration of the ninth renewal of some of the policies written by plaintiff. This suit is to recover commissions on such renewals up to the 9th on each policy.

Judgment of nonsuit was entered in the municipal court of the city of High Point, which was reversed on appeal to the Superior Court of Guilford County.

From the ruling of the Superior Court the defendant appeals, assigning errors.

PER CURIAM.

The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Clarkson, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands, according to the uniform practice of appellate courts, as the decision in this case, without becoming a precedent. Com. Co. v. Mfg. Co., 201 N.C. 823, 159 S.E. 411; Raynor v. Ins. Co., 193 N.C. 385, 137 S.E. 137; Jenkins v. Lbr. Co., 187 N.C. 864, 123 S.E. 82; Miller v. Bank, 176 N.C. 152, 96 S.E. 977; Durham v. R. R., 113 N.C. 240, 18 S.E. 208.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SEAY v. INSURANCE CO
(May 1, 1935)